Turns out, crime does pay, at least for hackers committing identity theft over the Internet.

In the article, “Why Internet crimes go unpunished,” security expert Roger Grimes breaks down some interesting numbers around cybercrime, and how hackers are (to put it mildly) beating the odds. According to the FBI’s 2011 Internet Crime Report, of the more than 300,000 complaints that netted criminals $1.1 billion in 2010, law enforcement agencies convicted an average of one crook for every 50,635 victims. In other words, as Grimes eloquently states:

Steal someone’s identity and your odds of being caught are almost infinitesimal.

With all the hacks and fraud headlines 2011 will be remembered for, that’s definitely not the way we want to ring in the New Year. But as Grimes also warns, if we aren’t careful we could see history repeat itself as criminals not only continue defrauding computer users, but launch recycled attacks against the explosion of worldwide mobile device users, who could fall victim to the same old PC tricks. (more…)

We all know cold remedies are made to treat the symptoms, not kill the virus. In a way, reactive anti-fraud solutions work the same way. They’re good at cleaning up the mess or correcting the problem once fraud has occurred, but have difficulty preventing cyber crimes from happening in the first place, or worse, stopping them from reoccurring over and over again.

The truth is, even diligent businesses running the latest security software remain vulnerable to the growing number of new and unknown forms of online fraud and abuse. Take it from Mark Patterson, co-owner of PATCO Construction Inc: when it comes to fighting ACH fraud the new FFIEC authentication guidance falls short. He says that until banks become legally liable and accountable for such online crimes, businesses will remain susceptible to online fraud.

In the BankInfoSecurity article, “Fraud: The Victim’s Perspective,” Patterson, whose small residential and commercial construction company lost over $550,000 to fraudulent ACH transactions, said that while he’s glad updates have been made to the security guidelines, they don’t go far enough. In order for small businesses to protect themselves from online crimes like ACH fraud and account takeover, they need to take it upon themselves to also incorporate their own internal policies and processes to detect fraud and abuse. Some of his recommendations include:

• Talk to your bank about the ACH fraud policy to understand if fraud losses are covered
• Monitor all online transactions for bad IP addresses, anomalies, and suspicious activity
• Run and analyze reports to recognize patterns and velocities
• Educate yourself about online threats and how bad they really are

(more…)

iovation is continually developing new features to meet customer business challenges, keep pace with the constantly changing Internet environment, respond to great customer ideas, and meet our own internal strategic goals.

It’s been a busy year with a ton of new features and enhancements ranging from big to small. We thought we’d take a moment to share with you some of the highlights from 2011.

As with any technology, there are many, many things that go into a new feature including design, development, testing, documentation, integration and other operational requirements. We won’t go into that amount of detail here, but instead will focus on the primary achievements within each of the four principle areas of specialization at iovation, which include:

Experian Fraud Director Chris Ryan addressed five major questions about compliance with the FFIEC’s recent guidance on banking authentication. What follows are his responses, summarized:

• What does “layered security” actually mean?

“‘Layered security’ refers to the arrangement of fraud tools in a sequential fashion. A layered approach starts with the most simple, benign and unobtrusive methods of authentication and progresses toward more stringent controls as the activity unfolds and the risk increases.”

• What does “multi-factor” authentication actually mean?

“A simple example of multi-factor authentication is the use of a debit card at an ATM machine. The plastic debit card is an item that you must physically possess to withdraw cash, but the transaction also requires the PIN number to complete the transaction. The card is one factor, the PIN is a second. The two combine to deliver a multi-factor authentication.”   (more…)

A few week’s back, I wrote how iovation’s fraud prevention service had been named as a finalist for the 2011 Red Herring 100 Global Award. This week we are proud to announce that iovation was named a Top 100 Global Company.

It’s truly an honor to follow in the footsteps of some of the most recognizable technology companies in the world such as Google, YouTube, Skype and eBay, who have all been previously selected to Red Herring’s prestigious Top 100 Global list.

This recognition is a direct result of years of hard work evolving our fraud protection service into a full spectrum device reputation solution that supports native and web integrations for mobile and desktop devices, tagged and tagless device recognition, real-time transparent risk scoring, and on-demand and scheduled reporting. Our remarkable growth is attributed to the collaborative work and effectiveness of our global device intelligence network, which today protects billions of transactions for our clients representing multiple industries around the globe. (more…)

In the hours following the two most-anticipated shopping days of the year — Black Friday and Cyber Monday — we’ve already seen a number of impressive figures that defy earlier modest expectations for the holiday season.

According to the NY Times article, “Cyber Monday Shopping Surpasses Expectations,” both ComScore and IBM Benchmark reported that the $1.3 billion spent by online shoppers represented up to a 33% increase in online sales over last year. This followed record-breaking Black Friday weekend sales of $52.4 billion, which CNN Money reported is a 16% jump over 2010. Either way you cut it, there’s little doubt that retail and online sales over the weekend could make for a very profitable holiday season for merchants.

At iovation, we help our clients know who to trust online, by quickly recognizing their good online customers and isolating the fraudsters through shared device intelligence. By identifying bad actors upfront and flagging suspicious transactions in real-time, we help merchants decline fraudulent orders faster, minimize chargebacks and take more good business with confidence — all especially important during the holiday’s peak traffic.

Looking at iovation’s device reputation network on Black Friday and Cyber Monday, we found some interesting trends and year-over-year comparisons during the two hottest shopping days of the year, including:

• 400% increase in the rate of fraudulent transactions (from 1% to 4%) on Black Friday
• 25% increase in the rate of fraudulent transactions (from 3% to 4%) on Cyber Monday
• 15% greater transaction volume on Cyber Monday compared to Black Friday
• 4% mobile fraud rate on both Black Friday and Cyber Monday

While it was no surprise that credit card fraud, shipping fraud and account takeovers topped the list of fraud types reported to iovation’s database on these days, a noticeable drop in the share of mobile shopping activity was very unexpected.

Despite several industry surveys forecasting significant increases in mobile purchases over the holidays, iovation saw mobile transactions decrease as a share of overall activity on Black Friday and Cyber Monday. While mobile transactions usually account for 5% of queries to iovation’s service, mobile’s share of overall retail transactions dropped to 3.2% on Black Friday and 2.7% on Cyber Monday. At this point any conclusions would be only speculative as to why mobile transactions were down during these peak periods. Are consumers not ready to make purchases over their smartphones? Is the user experience of a smartphone checkout too cumbersome compared to the convenience of a desktop?  As retailers look to the mobile market as an increasingly important channel, it will be critical that they solve these issues.

Every online user, including fraudsters, were granted a free pass by the Justice Department earlier this week for lying on the Internet. Okay, I know what you’re thinking: “How can we prosecute somebody for lying?” Fibbing is an age-old human behavior that even the DoJ says it doesn’t have the time or resources to bring cases against everyone who lies on dating websites.

According to the Politico article, “Free pass for dating site liars,” people can take comfort in knowing that they don’t have to worry about being prosecuted or hauled off to jail for telling a little white lie over the Internet. While this certainly makes sense, at the same time we’re still walking on shaky ground when it comes to online lies, falsifications, profile misinterpretations, or whatever you want to label it. The fact is, when it comes to identity fraud, fake accounts or other crimes on romance sites, lying is typically the basis for the crime. It sets the stage for deeper criminal activity that can cost victims both emotional and financial hardships, not to mention damage to the dating site’s reputation.  (more…)

“Carders” are the people who test and sell credit card details (most likely phished) to other individuals who carry out the actual credit card fraud. Carders are the most visible of criminals who distribute and sell stolen data to whoever is willing to take it and burn it onto a white card or make purchases over the internet. “Dumps” is a term for the batches stolen credit card data they buy and sell.

Computerworld reports:

“Tony Perez III, of Hammond, Indiana, pleaded guilty to the charges on April 4. In his plea, Perez said he sold counterfeit credit cards encoded with stolen account information. Perez found customers through criminal ‘carding forums,’ Internet discussion groups set up to aid in the buying and selling of stolen financial account information and related services.”

“During a June 2010 search of Perez’s residence, Secret Service agents found 20,987 stolen credit card accounts on his computers, in his email messages, in an online account and on counterfeit credit cards he was in the process of manufacturing, according to court documents. Credit card companies have reported more than US$3.1 million in fraudulent charges associated with those accounts, court documents said.”

Carding is a full time profession for thousands of hackers worldwide. Retailers’, banks’, credit card processors’, and many other corporations’ databases often contain millions of credit card numbers, and are targeted in “advanced persistent threats.” Any entity that accepts credit cards online or in the physical world is a ripe target for fraud. (more…)

People lie when they set up online dating profiles, they lie when they put up fake social media profiles, and they lie to the innocent victims of their scams.

Banks and retailers know better than anyone that people lie. There are countless scenarios and justifications, but people who lie invariably do it in order to get something.

In general, we strive to be a kind and civil species. We trust by default. We want to be helpful and accommodating. We don’t want to believe that people lie, but they do.

Dishonesty poses a challenge to banks and retailers in the form of theft. Theft is a big problem on the Internet, and any online business knows that they can’t afford to trust you, regardless of how honest you may be.

The Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council recently instructed both retailers and banks to enhance their security procedures, in response to the increasingly creative lies concocted by scammers.

One of those FFIEC recommendations involves incorporating complex device identification. This means that banks and retailers should adopt technology (more…)

“Simple device identification” relies on cookies or IP addresses to confirm that a customer is logging in from the same PC that was used to create the account.

The Financial Federal Institutions Examination Council has explained the fallibility of this system:

“Experience has shown this type of cookie may be copied and moved to a fraudster’s PC, allowing the fraudster to impersonate the legitimate customer. Device identification has also been implemented using geo-location or Internet protocol address matching. However, increasing evidence has shown that fraudsters often use proxies, which allow them to hide their actual location and pretend to be the legitimate user.”

“Complex device identification” is more sophisticated. This security technique relies on disposable, one-time cookies, and creates a complex digital fingerprint based on characteristics including PC configuration, Internet protocol addresses, and geolocation. According to the FFIEC, complex device identification is more secure, and institutions should no longer consider simple device identification adequate.

While complex device ID is more sophisticated, the next level of security is Device Reputation. This strategy incorporates geolocation, velocity, anomalies, proxy busting, webs of associations, fraud histories, commercially applied evidence of fraud or abuse, and more.

According to Max Anhoury, Vice President of Global Sales for iovation, “Financial institutions looking to stop fraud while reducing friction for good customers must tie together multiple layers of fraud and risk management for a holistic layered approach. Just this week, iovation presented to hundreds of financial services Info Security professionals and business managers regarding the recent FFIEC guidance (along with Experian Decision Analytics) about finding the optimal process points to strike the right balance between fraud prevention, customer experience and cost.”

You can listen to the FFIEC-related webinar presentation at: www.iovation.com/ffiec

If you work in the information security industry, complex device identification is nothing new. While the FFIEC recommends complex identification, you should really be doing something more. The truly forward-thinking have already moved on and are successfully leveraging the benefits of Device Reputation and shared device intelligence.

Simple device identification was in place before the FFIEC mandated it. Now they have mandated complex device identification, but leading InfoSec professionals are already doing more to protect their retail or commercial banking customers, by using device reputation.

Robert Siciliano, personal security and identity theft expert contributor to iovation, discusses credit and debit card fraud on CNBC. Disclosures

The ticker tape of data breaches in the last few months has been astounding. Many have called 2011 “The Year of The Hacker“ and that prognostication has rung true, without question. Halfway through the year, data breaches are an incessant news story.

And despite the constant stream of bad news, consumers continue divulging a tremendous amount of data to retailers, auction sites, dating sites, and gaming sites. While awareness of fraud and cybercrime is at an all time high, consumers seem to feel they don’t have much of a choice but to provide all their data.

People have grown to love the Internet and all the conveniences it offers, both commercially and socially. In my household, little people under five years old whack away at online iPhone games, never knowing what it’s like not to have the Internet.

Many seem to feel that their privacy is the price they must pay for all this connectedness and convenience, and are even willing to put their personal security at risk in exchange. (more…)

FFIEC is the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council which is a government body empowered to prescribe uniform principles, standards and report forms for the federal examination of financial institutions by and for numerous other government, public, private and financial entities.

If there is a “good” place for your tax dollars to head, it’s to the FFIEC. And very recently the FFIEC has issued updated guidelines for financial institutions in regards to their cyber security and new threats your bank needs to counter.

Over the past decade as we have all (mostly) have banked and bought stuff online, criminals have formed organized web mobs to sniff out transactions and take over existing accounts and in some cases open up new accounts.

The FFIEC has certainly pointed this out and at the same time has made additional security recommendations since the last time they did in 2005 based on new kinds of criminal hacking and new technologies to combat it.
(more…)

A U.S. court recently ruled that banks and financial institutions will not only be held liable for fraudulent losses from business accounts, but also bear the responsibility for protecting customers through the use of fraud detection mechanisms. This decision in no way, shape or form will change the way banks already go about detecting fraud by looking at everything from IP addresses, geolocation, velocities and anomalies that could tip off fraud professionals about potentially suspicious online transactions and other high-risk activity.

However, to ensure they stay one step ahead of today’s profit-driven fraudsters, banks need to use the most advanced, anti-fraud techniques to prevent criminals from gaining access to legitimate online bank accounts. Michael Grillo’s article, “Combating Online Banking Fraud – A Top 10 List,” provides a checklist of the essential fraud detection methods that all banks should consider to ensure they are doing everything they can to stop online fraud, including: (more…)

With fraud more pervasive than ever, one would think organizations and their financial institutions are taking every precaution to prevent malicious activities like corporate account takeover and fraud. But a recent study found that over the past year, there has been little to no improvement in small and medium-sized businesses’ ability to prevent fraudsters from stealing money from small business accounts that have been compromised.

In the article, “Independent Study Reveals Corporate Account Takeover Fraud Continues to Plague SMBs and Banks,” the 2011 Business Banking Trust Study found that SMBs have struggled to make progress in stopping payments fraud as 56% of businesses said they had experienced fraud within the last 12 months. While 61% said they were victimized more than once over that period, 75% of businesses participating in the study said they experienced online account takeover and/or online fraud.

With mobile banking growth rates on the rise, these findings are alarming to Dr. Larry Ponemon, chairman and founder of the Ponemon Institute, which commissioned the study. With 38% of respondents saying they access their company’s banking accounts from mobile devices such as smartphones and tablet PCs compared to 23% in 2010, Ponemon doesn’t anticipate things turning around for SMBs anytime soon.. (more…)

Device reputation spots online evildoers by examining the computer, smartphone, or tablet they are using to connect to any website. If a device is recognized as having previously committed some type of unwanted behavior, the website has the opportunity to reject the transaction, preventing damage before it occurs.

In the physical world, as the saying goes, “You are only as good as your word.” And when somebody says one thing and does another, we no longer trust them.

Online, people say and do things they never would in the real world. Internet anonymity fuels bad behavior. Websites’ comments sections are filled with vitriol that you’d never hear real people utter. Pedophiles who’d never approach a child on the street contact kids over the Internet. Sex offenders avoid the stigma of their label on dating sites and social media. Scammers create accounts in order to con people and businesses into forking over money. And identity thieves use your personal information to fill out online applications for credit. (more…)