Turns out, crime does pay, at least for hackers committing identity theft over the Internet.

In the article, “Why Internet crimes go unpunished,” security expert Roger Grimes breaks down some interesting numbers around cybercrime, and how hackers are (to put it mildly) beating the odds. According to the FBI’s 2011 Internet Crime Report, of the more than 300,000 complaints that netted criminals $1.1 billion in 2010, law enforcement agencies convicted an average of one crook for every 50,635 victims. In other words, as Grimes eloquently states:

Steal someone’s identity and your odds of being caught are almost infinitesimal.

With all the hacks and fraud headlines 2011 will be remembered for, that’s definitely not the way we want to ring in the New Year. But as Grimes also warns, if we aren’t careful we could see history repeat itself as criminals not only continue defrauding computer users, but launch recycled attacks against the explosion of worldwide mobile device users, who could fall victim to the same old PC tricks. (more…)

As banking applications evolve, common attacks on banks are becoming correspondingly more sophisticated. Small businesses, municipalities, and moneyed individuals are often targeted for obvious reasons: they have hundreds of thousands of dollars, if not a few million, in the bank, but their security is often no more effective than that of an average American household.

The Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council’s (FFIEC) updated security guidelines go into effect in less than a month. It is imperative that financial institutions recognize that the security precautions currently in place are ineffective in the face of new, more sophisticated attacks. Criminals have gotten around the minor hurdles posed by the tools being used to authenticate clients and prevent unauthorized transactions.

Basic multifactor authentication may be relatively effective for bank accounts that generally contain only enough to pay a month’s worth of bills. But high value accounts are more prone to attacks, and require additional levels of security. Ultimately, what is most important is that a security program includes multiple layers of protection rather than relying on a single mechanism of defense. (more…)

“Carders” are the people who test and sell credit card details (most likely phished) to other individuals who carry out the actual credit card fraud. Carders are the most visible of criminals who distribute and sell stolen data to whoever is willing to take it and burn it onto a white card or make purchases over the internet. “Dumps” is a term for the batches stolen credit card data they buy and sell.

Computerworld reports:

“Tony Perez III, of Hammond, Indiana, pleaded guilty to the charges on April 4. In his plea, Perez said he sold counterfeit credit cards encoded with stolen account information. Perez found customers through criminal ‘carding forums,’ Internet discussion groups set up to aid in the buying and selling of stolen financial account information and related services.”

“During a June 2010 search of Perez’s residence, Secret Service agents found 20,987 stolen credit card accounts on his computers, in his email messages, in an online account and on counterfeit credit cards he was in the process of manufacturing, according to court documents. Credit card companies have reported more than US$3.1 million in fraudulent charges associated with those accounts, court documents said.”

Carding is a full time profession for thousands of hackers worldwide. Retailers’, banks’, credit card processors’, and many other corporations’ databases often contain millions of credit card numbers, and are targeted in “advanced persistent threats.” Any entity that accepts credit cards online or in the physical world is a ripe target for fraud. (more…)

Good news in the fight against online fraud. The Financial Fraud Action UK recently announced that fraud stemming from card-not-present (CNP) transactions fell 8% over the same period last year.

In the InternetRetailing article, “Online shopping fraud down in first half of 2011,” during the six months ending in June, online shopping fraud including mail order and phone fraud dropped to £109.2m compared to the £118.2m in fraud losses in the first six months of 2010.

Source: Financial Fraud Action UK, Cheque & Credit Clearing Company and The UK Cards Association

While findings like these are certainly encouraging, it doesn’t mean the bad guys have given up. Far from it. While an increase in fraud protection measures play a significant role in the declining numbers, once a security hole is filled fraudsters typically turn their energies elsewhere.

DCI Paul Barnard, head of the Dedicated Cheque and Plastic Crime Unit (DCPCU), is quick to point out that while online shopping fraud losses are down, the fraudulent use of lost or stolen cards is up 20%.

“There has been an increase in old fashioned scams – criminals using distraction techniques and social engineering methods to get hold of people’s cards or phone banking details. We are urging everyone to be on their guard.”

As organized cyber criminals shift tactics, the ability to expose thieves who are fraudulently using someone else’s personal or financial information to purchase items online is essential to preventing fraud or abusive activity that impacts consumers and an online business’s bottom line. This is something iovation does every day for merchants that sell goods and services over the Internet.

Checking millions of daily transactions coming into our B2B customers’ websites against our dynamic, device reputation database that’s now 715 million deep, iovation’s ReputationManager 360 provides real-time device intelligence IT fraud teams need to instantly recognize and reject bad orders on the spot to prevent an array of fraud techniques and social engineering schemes designed to defraud today’s online businesses.

Much like the annual gains of any financial market, the cyber crime economy is growing.

According to the article, “Cyber crime hit 431 million adults in 24 countries,” a recent Norton cybercrime report found online crime jumped 3% compared to its 2010 study, costing fraud victims more than $388 billion worldwide over the past year.

Eating up 35% of the global cybercrime bill were U.S. fraud victims, who spent $139 billion on cybercrime last year. That amounts to 141 victims per minute, an alarming statistic even for Norton’s consumer cybercrime expert, Helen Malani. (more…)

For banks around the globe, protecting customer accounts is becoming more challenging as cyber criminals work together to create more sophisticated attacks with the aim of defeating existing security measures. In fact, fraudsters have become so efficient at figuring out new ways to access critical data from a bank’s IT system that the article,“European banking industry lacks guidance to combat cybercrime,” suggests that the entire ecosystem — from government to banks — should take a cue from the criminals themselves.

Back in 2005, the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) made security recommendations for banks and financial institutions in response to the increase of cybercrime. Since then, banks have implemented most, if not all, of these guidelines, and cyber criminals have responded by challenging each layer of security, by exploiting different technologies or coming up with new hacking techniques.

The latest security recommendations strongly suggest a layered or “defense-in-depth” approach, which the National Security Agency defines as a practical strategy for achieving Information Assurance in today’s highly networked environments. It is a “best practices” strategy in that it relies on the intelligent application of techniques and technologies that exist today. The strategy strikes a balance between the protection capability and cost, performance, and operational considerations.

The FFIEC recommends that financial institutions replace simple device identification with complex device identification, which most banks had already implemented long ago. Therefore, the next evolution of security is device reputation management, incorporating geolocation, velocity, anomalies, proxy busting, browser language, associations, fraud histories, and time zone differences. iovation, an Oregon-based security firm, offers this service and more.

The FFIEC also recommends that financial institutions replace challenge questions, which are often fact-based questions, and can be easy to figure out with the use social networking data, with “Out of Wallet” (OOW) questions that don’t rely on publicly available information.

Challenge questions include, “What’s your mother’s maiden name?” “What’s your Social Security Number?” “What are your kids’ names?” or “When were you born?” OOW questions are generally opinion-based, such as, “What is your favorite vacation spot?” “What is your favorite flavor of ice cream?” or “What is your favorite book?”

Keir Breitenfeld, Senior Director of Experian Decision Analytics recently joined Device Reputation pioneer and leader, iovation, for a webinar presentation addressing the FFIEC guidelines. You can listen to his presentation on applying proportional treatment to risk-based authentication efforts and dynamically managing credit and non-credit data questions to mitigate fraud via the webinar.

Ultimately, financial institutions must implement a layered approach to security. iovation’s device reputation service is a must-have layer that contributes greatly to a defense-in-depth approach, assessing risk throughout multiple points on an institution’s website.

Robert Siciliano, personal security and identity theft expert contributor to iovation, discusses credit and debit card fraud on CNBC. Disclosures

A recent report, published by the Office of Cyber Security & Information Assurance in the Cabinet Office and Detica, on the cost of cyber crime revealed that online crime costs the UK economy £27 billion per year. In the article, “UK Cabinet Office Report: The Cost of Cyber Crime,” UK businesses shell out more than three-quarters of the total annual cybercrime costs at £21 billion, while private citizens (£3.1bn) and the government (£2.2bn) round out the overall economical impact.

The study found that IP theft (£9.2bn) and industrial espionage (£7.6bn), combined, account for over two-thirds of the overall cost to UK businesses per annum. IP theft is largely committed against companies with high volumes of IP or IP that’s easy to hack, while industrial espionage includes stealing or exploiting non-IP data from organizations that depend on large amounts of financial transactions and monetary activities.

Other significant cyber crimes that impact UK businesses include extortion (£2.2bn), direct online theft (£1.3bn), and loss or stolen customer data (£1bn), according to the report.

Because organizations today are becoming increasingly dependent on cyber space for business commerce, communications, and daily operations and production, cyber threats pose a significant threat to individual nations, as well as the global economy. This is why reports like these are so important.

Understanding the economical impact cyber crime can have on businesses, industry, and the economy can play a critical role in setting effective security policies and implementing proactive fraud preventative strategies, such as iovation’s device reputation service, which combats new and evolving forms of cyber crime that have a negative impact on organizations across the globe.

The ticker tape of data breaches in the last few months has been astounding. Many have called 2011 “The Year of The Hacker“ and that prognostication has rung true, without question. Halfway through the year, data breaches are an incessant news story.

And despite the constant stream of bad news, consumers continue divulging a tremendous amount of data to retailers, auction sites, dating sites, and gaming sites. While awareness of fraud and cybercrime is at an all time high, consumers seem to feel they don’t have much of a choice but to provide all their data.

People have grown to love the Internet and all the conveniences it offers, both commercially and socially. In my household, little people under five years old whack away at online iPhone games, never knowing what it’s like not to have the Internet.

Many seem to feel that their privacy is the price they must pay for all this connectedness and convenience, and are even willing to put their personal security at risk in exchange. (more…)

Remember the days when being a cyber crook required specific computer programming skills that allowed hackers to crack codes and exploit vulnerabilities on a system? It was a job only for those who possessed rare talents and had loads of time on their hands. Not anymore. Today’s cyber criminals are a far cry — and are much less specialized — from the cyber crooks of yesterday.

According to the Wall Street Journal article, “Cyber crime now an industry,” the average cyber criminal is not at all who we think he is. He’s not some socially awkward kid cooped up in a poorly lit basement causing havoc across the globe. That’s not to say there aren’t organized gangs causing worldwide headaches. There are. But, from a technical standpoint, the majority of those perpetrating online fraud and abuse are more like you and me. (more…)

A recent Norton study estimates that cybercrime will cost Britain £1.9 billion in 2011. That’s an average cost of £103 per victim of online crimes. This information is based on the security firm’s new Cybercrime Index, which displays online threat levels in various countries.

By taking data collected from 113 million servers globally that track cyber attacks like identity theft, phishing threats and fraud activity, the Cybercrime Index is a website that acts like a stock index, informing Internet users about the day’s biggest online threats. (more…)

A recent global study on online security revealed that over the past year nearly one in three U.S. online consumers have experienced online credit card fraud. The study, which surveyed the experiences and perceptions of consumers from the U.S., Finland, Malaysia, Poland, Sweden and the U.K., had some interesting findings, including:

Studies like these continue to remind us of how vulnerable consumers are to the growing threats that exist online. Unfortunately, the second victim to these crimes are the online merchants that are targeted by cyber criminals using stolen data to commit fraudulent transactions. (more…)

Yesterday, President Obama took an important step toward putting cyber security front and center by appointing Howard Schmidt as cyber security coordinator. Not only will this significantly aide in advancing the current administration’s cyber security initiatives—it’s also a critical step forward in the private sector’s fight against cyber crime.

Given the impact that cyber crime has on our economy, online businesses especially have a lot riding on the success of these government initiatives. A recent report from LexisNexis estimates that U.S. businesses lose $191 billion annually from computer related crimes. This is why Mr. Schmidt’s combined experience in both government and the private sector will hopefully be an important asset, allowing him to simultaneously understand the issues currently facing businesses and be able to cut through the red tape on Capitol Hill to make real change happen. (more…)

In the UK, identity fraud has been identified as one of the fastest growing crimes in 2009. In response to this alarming news, the UK government is kicking off a National Identity Fraud Prevention Week to try to raise awareness about the issue and focus on what individuals and businesses can do to protect themselves.

With a website devoted to the new campaign, it’s easy to take a quick look at some statistics about fraud in the UK, and some of them are quite frightening. While the information on the site is based on UK numbers, the concerns that those statistics raise are likely applicable in many countries, as identify theft is a world-wide problem. (more…)